Everyone knows that maintaining a civilization or a heritage alive is related to maintaining the language of that culture or tradition alive. After the language is lost, the means of life and its customs are lost also. Why would this be?
Because Just about all languages develop together with the means of life, and the phrases, and rules and structures of what is spoken function simply to express what is vital to the society? An individual may see here language as a tool of control. Because what is deemed necessary to any specific culture has ever been selected by the ruling class, thus what can and cannot be spoken will also be set by the ruling class.
Why has the Central terminology of progress Aegis Advisors, change, development and innovation been English? Since English is less about a specific society or amassing and more about communication. English speaking societies such as all societies control people by controlling what can and cannot be said. However, this is contrary to the spirit of English. English is not a language that does not belong to a culture or tradition, nor should it be forced to conform to the ideals and concepts of any one gathering. It is truly the primary free speech, and is not, nor can it ever be a language of conformity.
A language must conform to the method of life that it serves looks like an abacus, in the sense that it is just a single means of expressing or communicating, or conceptualizing its own reality. This makes progress and change almost impossible.
It is not hard to see that virtually every progress in science, and invention, and social politics has come from the minds of people who belonged or belong to the states where English conversation has grown. On the off Chance that you are learning how to speak English, you probably believe English comes from America, or England, and is a language which adheres to the ideals and theories and beliefs of the ruling classes of those countries. In case you feel that, we at English revolution think you will find learning English tougher than it has to be.
It is valid, These nations have done their best to create their version of ib english the internationally accepted version, and have tried and do try to control individuals by judgment what can and cannot be mentioned, and how and when it has been said, and what is right and incorrect.